<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for M16 Scopes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m16scopes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m16scopes.com</link>
	<description>Scopes, Sight, Lasers and Gear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 06:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on m-16 shooting test by d0dgeball</title>
		<link>http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>d0dgeball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 06:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>m16a1 has more recoil than later models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m16a1 has more recoil than later models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on m-16 shooting test by robotsant77</title>
		<link>http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>robotsant77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 05:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>@Calvert1212 yeah that why you dont touch it but i thought it was pretty good. the recoil wasnt too bad but the accuracy wasnt the best </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Calvert1212 yeah that why you dont touch it but i thought it was pretty good. the recoil wasnt too bad but the accuracy wasnt the best </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on m-16 shooting test by Bartolini87</title>
		<link>http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartolini87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 04:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>@srj111 M16 is the best most popular assault rife and its number 1 us army uses it </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@srj111 M16 is the best most popular assault rife and its number 1 us army uses it </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on m-16 shooting test by HavocProductions1943</title>
		<link>http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>HavocProductions1943</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 04:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>@Bartolini87 its not evan a great weapon that everyone says it is! it fires a shitty 5.56  round which does fuck all and its a piece of shit its self it jams it breaks if u drop it. know wonder you yanks lose fucking 200,000 men in every stupid war you fight in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bartolini87 its not evan a great weapon that everyone says it is! it fires a shitty 5.56  round which does fuck all and its a piece of shit its self it jams it breaks if u drop it. know wonder you yanks lose fucking 200,000 men in every stupid war you fight in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on m-16 shooting test by CoolSeaMonkeys</title>
		<link>http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolSeaMonkeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m16scopes.com/m-16-shooting-test/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>@HavocProductions1943 its good for an training gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HavocProductions1943 its good for an training gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

